Since Andrew “stole” my projector for his Man Cave Multi-Screen extravaganza I have had to share time on Jane’s TV which is just not acceptable. So – I was minding my own business on Xmas day, checking my email when I saw that Staples had an HD projector on as a door crasher for $249. While this unit would not cut it at the CinePlex Odeon, its capabilities were just fine for me, so with a 20 minute line-up pre 9:00 AM opening on the 26th (a civilized hour) I snagged one of these and Cavette #2 is now resupplied with big screen wall TV. Now I just have to steal back a cable feed to go with my DVDs.
Xmas – 2 – A second self purchased gift item was an external Disk dock for Sata drives via USB or eSata. Loyal readers will recall that several months ago I had some severe computer stress and nearly “lost” the contents of my internal hard drive. Fortunately, most of th data was backed up an I was able to perform open drive surgery and resuscitate the drive. It has been sitting inside my PC disconnected ever since as I had put in a new drive. Now with my new external plug and play toy, I pulled the drive out of my computer, popped it into the Dock and Zesto / Presto, up pups Drive letter “F” in “My Computer with the entire drive contacts intact and ready to go (via USB of course – slower than internal but still there).
The topic was then, as now, my point of view on the local Minor Hockey Administration. For those who wonder why I do what I do (and sometimes that includes me), give the letter a read. Ergo - as Popeve says “I Yam What I Yam”.
For those of you who have been around for a while (maybe quite a while), it is interesting how some things never really change. It is also interesting how a common denominator / key protagonist was / is central to the then and now.
September 25, 1997
An open letter to all hockey parents, players and concerned members
of the Oakville minor hockey community.
As we begin another hockey season I have personally reached the point where I am no longer prepared to sit back and quietly accept what I consider as unacceptable behaviour by members of the Oakville Minor Oaks Hockey Association (MOHA).
I feel that my point of view on a number of key issues has once again lead the MOHA to decline to offer me a coach’s position in my son’s level. This is despite the fact that I have been active in the system and have invested both my time and dollars to continue to develop my qualifications. While personal disappointment and “ego” are always at play in any situation like this, and it is easy to shrug this off as “sour grapes”, many of you know me from my past involvement in both Oakville minor hockey and baseball. Based on that knowledge, I would ask that you give my request serious consideration.
Specifically, I am requesting that the MOHA executive and coaches selection committee publicly justify their selection process, evaluation criteria and the qualifications of the “successful” candidates versus my own.
I would ask that you consider my “qualifications” in the context of an equitable coaches selection process, Please keep them in mind when considering both the comments I am making about the organization and the standards you should expect and demand from the organization and individual(s) entrusted with coaching your sons or daughters this year.
Personal Qualifications:
· Canadian Hockey Association National Coaches Certification Program
Coach and Intermediate level certification
· 4 years of hockey coaching experience as an assistant or head coach (reaching the final twice, winning once)
· Assisted in convening 1996/97 Atom and kept league statistics
· Son selected as alternate to Minor “A” peewee team and therefore is a qualified “red” level player I was not applying to coach “red” just so my son can play there
· Arranged for sponsorship for the 97/98 season (in excess of minimum sponsorship fee)
· I had identified an individual to assist as a trainer and have always successfully recruited “parents” into the system as volunteers with my teams.
· My wife has been an active volunteer for the Hockey M.O.M.S. organization
· Eight years of minor baseball coaching experience, tournament organization and management as well as extensive additional volunteer support for the OMBA by both my wife and myself.
· Willing to have any parent or child on any team I have coached contacted for evaluation as well as to provide references from opposing coaches in either sport.
At this point I have not been given a team. Moreover, I have not had the courtesy of contact by the MOHA to notify me of their decision, nor even to ask if I would consider working with someone.
Last year the MOHA’s excuse when I was not given a team was that they “lost my application/card” and “didn’t know I wanted to coach”. After that it was too late because “all spots were filled” – I teamed up with another coach and we won the division championship. I am not prepared to accept that type of story this year.
Perhaps the real reasons that I am not being considered are my criticisms of MOHA management attitudes as opposed to my coaching qualifications. These concerns can be broadly summarized as follows:
First:
My philosophy on coaching, which apparently differs from that practiced by the MOHA, is that House League hockey is for the kids, not the league, not the coaches and not even for the parents. The primary objectives are for the kids to have fun, be provided with an opportunity to learn individual and team skills and develop sportsmanship and values that will contribute to their personal growth and development through life. While winning is important to all of us and is part of the competitive nature of sport, it is not and should not be the only or primary objective.
Second:
In my opinion, the treatment of “red” versus “white” house league kids in the MOHA system has been unacceptable and for me is a particular concern this year. It is also a position I expressed to the organization at the end of last year. My concern this year is that my son’s age group are now moving up to minor peewee. At this age level, “red” teams have body contact, “white” do not. Most kids want to play contact hockey because to them that is part of “real” hockey. A number of them are going to be disappointed this year because according to an arbitrary decision they “aren’t good enough to play red”. Last year there were 6 “red” and 8 “white” atom teams because there were only “enough red caliber players” for six teams.
I have been informed that the 6 / 8 team division would likely be in place again this year for minor peewee. While I personally disagree with this concept, it is also my understanding that it is contrary to the regulations of the MOHA (Section D, Subsection 1, Rule 12 Team Strength/Drop-Outs) that stipulates that “red” teams will be at least one half the players assigned to the combined “red” and “white” leagues. Unless this regulation has been changed it has been ignored in the past to provide better “red” teams.
I would much rather challenge the intermediate level kids to play “up” and develop their skills than require them to play in the lower tier where they will not have the same competitive environment to develop. The additional risk is that we turn them off of a great game and lose them for future years to other potentially less constructive activities.
When this point of view was expressed to the level convenor, he first indicated that he was unaware of this requirement and then that the MOHA was going 6 / 8 because our “red” teams were no longer competitive – “we don’t even bother challenging Brampton any more because we aren’t good enough”. Tournament or outside games are a nice benefit for the players and I wholeheartedly support participation. However, let’s remember that these are house league, not travel teams and that overall competitiveness within any league can easily be achieved by properly rating the players and balancing the teams. There are many tournaments and teams available at all levels for coaches to find suitable opportunities for their “red” or “white” teams to have enjoyable and competitive outside opportunities. How will you or your son or daughter feel if he or she is one of the players relegated to “white” so that a “red” coach can have a better road team.
Third:
Another area of concern that I have raised with MOHA members is that all kids should receive equitable treatment within the system for the same dues. Equitable scheduling of practice times (e.g., 6:00 am), equal amounts of ice time, full sheet or half ice, numbers of games and or access to facilities and equipment. Rep or travel teams that use or require incremental support should pay for it. House league dollars should not support rep or travel teams the way they do today. An example of this even within house league was the attempt last year to have atom “white” teams share ice for practice while red teams had full ice because of a scheduling problem. Appropriate ice was found only after the “white” teams’ coaches, players and parents started a petition against the league.
Fourth:
A final area that I am not going to comment on in detail is financial. This year’s fee increase versus what we receive for it relative to other jurisdictions is a concern for all of us. The circumstances that have lead up to it and the financial position of the MOHA. Are issues that you may draw your own conclusions on or ask for a personal explanation from the MOHA executive or directors.
In summary, many of you may have wondered why so many of our kids have quit hockey or have left the MOHA ranks to play elsewhere. You may also wonder why there are so many coaching problems and difficulties in attracting “good” people. Perhaps these comments may help you understand some of the reasons and frustrations.
Going public with this letter means that I will likely be permanently “black listed” by the current MOHA organization and never offered a team. It may also impact the treatment my son receives within the system. It is a decision I have struggled with because I love the game, I enjoy the opportunity and privilege of working with the kids, and I am concerned about the potential backlash to my own son from my speaking out. However, there comes a time when you can not remain silent and accept the abuses of the system or individuals within it. Once again I challenge the MOHA to defend their actions. To publicly identify the selection process, the individuals, the criteria they used to determine their coaches, and their rationale in declining to offer me a team versus their “successful” candidates. I would also challenge them to defend their treatment of the house league system in general, and the “red” versus “white” distribution practices specifically.
As an individual who has invested both the hours and dollars to develop my personal qualifications and spent the time with the kids over the years, I believe I am entitled to that explanation. As a parent with a child in the system, I would also expect an explanation and I would encourage all of you to ask for it as well.
If this appears to be a blanket condemnation of everyone within the organization, it is not! There are many excellent coaches within the system who are volunteering their time and working hard with the best interests of the kids at heart. My compliments to those individuals and I hope your son or daughter is fortunate enough to end up on one of their teams. My concerns and frustrations are directed at those individuals within the MOHA who have the position and power to put their own interests, egos and personal agendas ahead of the welfare of the kids and the members they are supposed to serve.
If we all sit back and accept it, these practices will continue. However, if you share my concerns or want an explanation of the issues I have raised, I would encourage you to contact the MOHA office and ask for answers. If you are not satisfied with their response or want to let someone else know how you feel, I would urge you to contact the mayor’s office to voice your concern. If you are reluctant to express your views this way, please feel free to give me a call with your opinions. Most importantly, I would also ask that you raise these questions or remember these concerns when it is time to elect next year’s slate.
Sincerely,
Wayne Moorehead
1305 Greeniaus Road
Oakville, Ontario L6J 6Y3 Telephone (905) 829-1551
Just as an FYI – Andrew did “suffer” because of me – Despite being the last cut from the single A team that year and being promised an “AP” position on the team (before this surfaced), he never heard from that coach again and never tried out for Rep again.
Looks like I just can’t play nice with some people or maybe . . .